Cesar Ramirez vs Brett Joelson Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L L W L L L
Form
L W W L W L W L W LHead To Head: Ramirez 1 - 0 Joelson
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ramirez winning 2 and Joelson winning 0. The last match between Ramirez and Joelson was at the Mexico F3, 03-05-2010, Second, Hard with Cesar Ramirez getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cesar Ramirez | 1 |
| Brett Joelson | 0 |
Mexico F3(03-05-2010)
6
4
6
3
| Ramirez | Stats | Joelson |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 780 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 391 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 35 | Age | 40 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (184-143) | Career Total W/L | 34% (20-38) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $550 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cesar Ramirez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Matt Kuhar
Player
Cesar Ramirez
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
51 of
68)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Cesar Ramirez
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
14
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jim Hendrikx
Player
Cesar Ramirez
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
54 of
66)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cesar Ramirez
Player
Ernesto Ruy Sanchez Pavon
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Cesar Ramirez
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Cesar Ramirez
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mwendwa Mbithi
Player
Cesar Ramirez
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
48%
(
19 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
39
|
2-6 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mateo Gomez
Player
Cesar Ramirez
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
48%
(
10 of
21)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
55%
(
21 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
28
Total Points Won
40
|
0-6 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mateo Gomez
Player
Cesar Ramirez
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Brett Joelson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andrei Daescu
Player
Brett Joelson
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Brett Joelson
Player
Mark Verryth
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
10
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
21 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivier Sajous
Player
Brett Joelson
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
44%
(
30 of
68)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
10
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brett Joelson
Player
Jonathan Brooklyn
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
12
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (184/143) | Win/Loss | 34% (20/38) |
| 58% (417/299) | Sets Win/Loss | 38% (50/81) |
| 54% (3522/2945) | Games Win/Loss | 44% (550/686) |
| 58% (125/89) | Hard Win/Loss | 28% (10/26) |
| 53% (54/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) |
| 45% (5/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 208 | Aces Total | 38 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 202 | Total Double Faults | 21 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 548.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.4 |
| 67% (2957/4412) | 1st Serve % | 56% (194/347) |
| 67% (1972/2957) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (136/194) |
| 46% (676/1455) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (74/153) |
| 47% (192/406) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (10/37) |
| 39% (1750/4471) | Return Points Win % | 36% (123/338) |
| 47% (7/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (2/6) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 34% (24/47) | Challenger W/L | 32% (8/17) |
| 65% (151/82) | Futures W/L | 35% (11/20) |
| 59% (177/298) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 34% (20/58) |
| 33% (4/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (32/83) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (9/21) |
| 39% (26/66) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 88% (195/172) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (23/19) |
| 10% (195/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (23/4) |
| 10% (130/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 3% (35/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
